Who's actually running AI in their ads right now

It's not all landing well

This is the part worth paying attention to. Coca-Cola's AI Christmas ads got called "soulless" two years running, with real boycott threats — because Christmas is the most nostalgic, human part of that brand, and AI felt like a betrayal of it. Toys "R" Us got the same reaction: "creepy," not magical. Big budgets and cutting-edge tools didn't protect either brand from a bad read on their own audience.

That's the actual lesson — not "AI ads flopped." The brands that used AI to do something only AI could do — Cadbury's thousands of personalized shop mentions, H&M cutting reshoot costs while keeping their actual models' consent — landed fine. The brands that used AI to replace the human, emotional core of what people already loved about them got called out for it immediately.

The adoption numbers are real

This isn't a handful of headline-chasing brands. Industry data puts AI-in-ad-creative adoption among top advertisers somewhere between 67% and 90% depending on how it's measured — up sharply from around 55% just a year ago. AI in advertising has moved from novelty to default this fast.

What this actually means for a small business

You don't need a Sora subscription or an OpenAI partnership to take something useful from this. What you need is the same discipline these brands are (mostly) missing:

The takeaway isn't "start running AI ads because Coca-Cola and Tommy Hilfiger are." It's that even brands with unlimited budgets are still learning the same lesson small businesses need to learn: AI works when it's a tool applied with intention, and it backfires when it's used to skip the thinking. That's true whether your ad budget has nine zeros or three.

If you're using AI-generated visuals in a Meta ad, disclosure isn't optional — Meta's review system flags undisclosed AI content and it affects your account's health score. See Using AI-generated images in your Meta ads? You now have to disclose it.